www.3ders.org

Jul 17, 2017 | By Tess

LPW Technology, a UK-based developer, manufacturer, and supplier of metal powders, recently conducted an investigation into a cracked 3D printed part and found that the defect was caused by powder contamination. The case study, said LPW, shows the “complexity of the AM process” and the importance of following strict procedures for powder maintenance.

We already know that metal 3D printing is a complicated process that requires stringent quality control and monitoring. What people might not realize, however, is that even a slight lapse in these processes can result in devastatingly defected 3D printed parts. This was recently proven through an investigation that LPW Technology conducted into a cracked component 3D printed for an industrial gas turbine application.

According to a recent publication by the UK-based company, one of its clients recently brought it a turbine part made using a selective laser melting (SLM) 3D printing process. The part, made from aluminum AlSi10Mg, exhibited some cracking, and LPW was tasked with figuring out the cause of the defect. The suspect? The metal 3D printing powder.

In order to determine the cause of the defect, LPW first tested a retained sample from the U.S. client’s order. After a full chemical and size analysis was conducted on the sample using LPW’s state-of-the-art equipment, the company found that there was no contamination of the powder that was shipped to the company. Among the processes used to test the metal powder were Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX).

The next step then was to investigate a sample of powder sent from the company, along with the 3D printed part itself. After conducting tests on the company’s powder sample, LPW found that the aluminum powder was, in fact, contaminated. This became clear after EDX testing found foreign Inconel 625 particles dispersed in the aluminum powder.

The contamination, it turns out, was caused during a material change for the SLM 3D printer. That is, LPW’s client realized that its powder feed stock had recently been changed from Inconel 625 to AlSi10Mg by a “relatively junior operator” who had not properly cleaned the SLM equipment.

As LPW stated: “This is a prime example of the complexity of the AM process and how working with the highly experienced LPW team can limit exposure to risk. The customer had been unaware that a few stray particles left from a machine changeover could have such an impact on the part quality.”

How could such a tiny amount of Inconel 625 in the AlSi10Mg powder have such a severe effect? LPW found that the former, which is a nickel alloy, has a “very limited solubility” in aluminum. And while the nickel powder was mostly spread homogeneously throughout the aluminum powder, in some areas it was more concentrated, with wt% in excess of 40%. It was these areas where the parts experienced the most cracking and damage.

All in all, LPW said it only it four days to get to the bottom of its client’s metal 3D printing mystery. It offers its investigation service to all its clients in case of any defects caused by materials.

 

 

Posted in 3D Printing Materials

 

 

Maybe you also like:

• T-Bone Cape motion control board launches on Indiegogo
• New extruder could lower costs of 3D printing cellular structures for drug testing
• New Ninja Printer Plate for consumer 3D printing
• mUVe3D releases improved Marlin firmware for all 3D printers
• Zecotek plans HD 3D display for 3D printers
• Add a smart LCD controller to your Robo3D printer
• Maker Kase: a handy cabinet for 3D printers
• Heated bed for ABS printing with the Printrbot Simple XL
• Next gen all metal 3D printer extruder from Micron
• Pico all-metal hotend 100% funded in 48 hours, B3 announces Stretch Goal
• Create it REAL announces first 3D printing Real Time Processor
• A larger and more powerful 3D printer extruder on Kickstarter

   

Leave a comment:

Your Name: